Information design fail
Tuesday, May 4th, 2010 13:36![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I thought I knew better, but it took someone else to point out what was wrong with this display of times available for appointments:
If it happens not to leap out at you: which color indicates available, and which indicates unavailable? I knew perfectly well, of course: I drew shaded boxes to indicate the times of interest, i.e. the available ones — but the interpretation that the unavailable times are blocked off is equally plausible.
This could be solved by a legend, but that is less readable at a glance and unaesthetic. What I did — after printing several copies and then having the problem pointed out — was hand-draw arrows-to-bars (⇤⇥) vertically over the available spans. But what would have been a good clean solution to start with? What comes to mind is to eliminate the grid lines in the unavailable areas, so that only the gray-is-available interpretation provides definite start and end times.
What would you do?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 20:27 (UTC)Expanding the time range is one of the options I thought of while writing this post, but I cut it afterward. It seems reasonably clear, but will take up more space.
Dark vs. light, or hatching is a good point. I don't like the idea of having a general dark background for the whole chart though — too much contrast with the overall white paper.
I should clarify that this is not a write-in appointment book (though there is one); this is an advertisement indicating the available times, which are signed up for elsewhere.
Red vs. green is a classic “AUGH THE COLORS” aesthetic mistake if done poorly; I can't offhand imagine any shades of red and green that would work well for this situation — being clearly meaningful and yet neither muddy nor garish.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-05 21:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-05 22:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-06 00:00 (UTC)